27/07/2025
Can a machine think like an artist?
Post 2/3 - Precedents + Positioning
This project wasn’t about using a machine to represent space ✨architecture✨. It was about using one to interrogate it.
The drawing machine sits at the intersection of two lineages:
1. Technical - from 18th century automata designed by clockmakers, to the Jacquard loom, to scientific medical and environmental instruments, to plotters & coders, before arriving at current AI/ machine learning systems.
2. Conceptual - from surrealist automatism to Nat Chard’s critique on the contingency of architectural drawing and Philip Beesley’s sentient structures. These are machines that don’t necessarily draw but challenge authorship and provoke new ways of thinking.
Our machine joined the discourse. Built from salvaged parts, it wasn’t just a tool, it was poly-propositional:
🌀What kinds of spatial language emerge when constraints like scarcity, absurdity, and unpredictability are embedded in process?
🌀How can machines shape our reading of space, and of each other?
For longer reflections, I’ll unpack this further on Substack: deanvandervord.substack.com
University Studio:
A question I hear asked all the time. Will AI driven machines be able to fully replicate human creativity?